HR

Employee offboarding

Departures require coordinated access revocation, equipment return, document handling and knowledge transfer under time pressure.

Business problem

Departures require coordinated access revocation, equipment return, document handling and knowledge transfer under time pressure.

What teams see

  • Work waits between receive termination event and confirm authority.
  • Owners reconstruct status from HRIS and Identity provider.

Why it happens

  • No shared state spans HRIS, Identity provider, Jira.
  • Decision and exception rules are applied inconsistently.

Why it becomes expensive

  • Capacity is consumed by coordination and rework.
  • Late exceptions weaken visibility and service quality.

Business outcomes

  • Shorter close employee record cycle
  • Fewer handoff and missing-information exceptions
  • Clear ownership from receive termination event to close employee record
  • Inspectable decisions and recovery

Measurable KPIs

  • Turnaround time: Elapsed time from receive termination event to close employee record.
  • Manual intervention rate: Share of items needing a person outside defined review conditions.
  • Exception age: Time unresolved exceptions remain without a completed action.
  • Successful completion rate: Share of valid workflow items completing without terminal failure.

How the workflow works

  1. Receive termination event — Accept and identify the employee offboarding trigger. HRIS
  2. Confirm authority — Execute confirm authority with validated sample data and an auditable result. SEIDO Review Queue
  3. Schedule access revocation — Execute schedule access revocation with validated sample data and an auditable result. Identity provider
  4. Request equipment return — Execute request equipment return with validated sample data and an auditable result. Jira
  5. Assign knowledge transfer — Execute assign knowledge transfer with validated sample data and an auditable result. HRIS
  6. Collect final evidence — Execute collect final evidence with validated sample data and an auditable result. Identity provider
  7. HR approval — Execute hr approval with validated sample data and an auditable result. SEIDO Review Queue
  8. Close employee record — Execute close employee record with validated sample data and an auditable result. HRIS
  9. Audit and KPI update — Persist the execution outcome, audit facts and workflow measurement events. SEIDO execution store

Integrations and ownership

  • HRIS: Provide workflow input
  • Identity provider: Lookup and update context
  • Jira: Receive controlled outcome

Human responsibility: People operations lead

Failure and recovery

HRIS is temporarily unavailable.

Retry with capped exponential backoff; preserve the run and move it to the inspectable failure queue after the limit.

Required data for confirm authority is malformed or missing.

Stop downstream actions and show the missing fields, source evidence and correction action to the named reviewer.

The trigger or provider event is delivered more than once.

Return the existing execution identified by the idempotency key and do not repeat downstream business actions.

The human decision expires before completion.

Escalate to the configured substitute, retain the original request and record both expiry and reassignment.

When not to build this

  • Monthly volume is too low to justify integrating HRIS, Identity provider, Jira.
  • An existing configured platform already handles employee offboarding with adequate ownership and reporting.
  • Reliable source data or supported API access is unavailable.
  • No business owner has authority to define the decision and exception rules.

Related workflows