Professional Services

Scope-change management

Client requests expand delivery work before impact, authority, price and project changes have been assessed and approved.

Business problem

Client requests expand delivery work before impact, authority, price and project changes have been assessed and approved.

What teams see

  • Work waits between submit change request and link agreed scope.
  • Owners reconstruct status from Jira and Cloud storage.

Why it happens

  • No shared state spans Jira, Cloud storage, Accounting platform.
  • Decision and exception rules are applied inconsistently.

Why it becomes expensive

  • Capacity is consumed by coordination and rework.
  • Late exceptions weaken visibility and service quality.

Business outcomes

  • Shorter update project plan cycle
  • Fewer handoff and missing-information exceptions
  • Clear ownership from submit change request to update project plan
  • Inspectable decisions and recovery

Measurable KPIs

  • Turnaround time: Elapsed time from submit change request to update project plan.
  • Manual intervention rate: Share of items needing a person outside defined review conditions.
  • Exception age: Time unresolved exceptions remain without a completed action.
  • Successful completion rate: Share of valid workflow items completing without terminal failure.

How the workflow works

  1. Submit change request — Accept and identify the scope-change management trigger. Jira
  2. Link agreed scope — Execute link agreed scope with validated sample data and an auditable result. Jira
  3. Describe difference — Execute describe difference with validated sample data and an auditable result. Cloud storage
  4. Estimate effort and cost — Execute estimate effort and cost with validated sample data and an auditable result. Accounting platform
  5. Review impact — Execute review impact with validated sample data and an auditable result. SEIDO Review Queue
  6. Obtain approval — Execute obtain approval with validated sample data and an auditable result. SEIDO Review Queue
  7. Create change record — Execute create change record with validated sample data and an auditable result. Accounting platform
  8. Update project plan — Execute update project plan with validated sample data and an auditable result. Jira
  9. Audit and KPI update — Persist the execution outcome, audit facts and workflow measurement events. SEIDO execution store

Integrations and ownership

  • Jira: Provide workflow input
  • Cloud storage: Lookup and update context
  • Accounting platform: Receive controlled outcome

Human responsibility: Engagement manager

Failure and recovery

Jira is temporarily unavailable.

Retry with capped exponential backoff; preserve the run and move it to the inspectable failure queue after the limit.

Required data for link agreed scope is malformed or missing.

Stop downstream actions and show the missing fields, source evidence and correction action to the named reviewer.

The trigger or provider event is delivered more than once.

Return the existing execution identified by the idempotency key and do not repeat downstream business actions.

The human decision expires before completion.

Escalate to the configured substitute, retain the original request and record both expiry and reassignment.

When not to build this

  • Monthly volume is too low to justify integrating Jira, Cloud storage, Accounting platform.
  • An existing configured platform already handles scope-change management with adequate ownership and reporting.
  • Reliable source data or supported API access is unavailable.
  • No business owner has authority to define the decision and exception rules.

Related workflows